California law requires that a prospective purchaser of a firearm go in-person to a federally and state-licensed firearm dealer and apply for the transfer of a firearm. While this is not unique to California, what is unique is that even when the State has confirmed (often within minutes) that an individual is not prohibited from possessing firearms, California law imposes a 10-day waiting period before the person can receive the firearm. Thus, Californians are subject to an arbitrarily chosen delay before they may exercise their Second Amendment rights.
Worse, California’s law has nearly two dozen exemptions favoring certain classes of people, all while discriminating against the average, peaceable individual. Those favored classes include, among others, individuals who hold an “entertainment firearms permit” (“the Hollywood Exception”), various members of law enforcement, individuals who are loaned firearms for use as props, and consultants or evaluators who are loaned firearms.
On May 1, 2023, the Second Amendment Foundation filed suit, along with two other civil rights organizations, two firearms dealers and their owners, and four individuals. The lawsuit asks a federal court to declare that California’s waiting period violates Californians’ Second and Fourteenth Amendment rights and enjoin the Defendants from enforcing the waiting period against prospective purchasers.
Case Team: Bradley Benbrook, Stephen Duvernay
Recent Docket Activity
August 5th, 2025
ORDER : In light of the Ninth Circuit's acceptance of Yukutake v. Lopez for en banc review, see No. 21-16756 , this case is stayed until the en banc panel issues a decision. The parties must file a joint status report within 15 days of the Ninth Circuit's decision. Signed by District Judge Andrew G. Schopler on 8/5/2025.
August 4th, 2025
STATUS REPORT / Joint Status Report by Rob Bonta, Allison Mendoza. .
April 4th, 2025
ORDER : The parties' joint motion to vacate the pending deadlines is granted. The parties must file a joint status report within 15 days of the Ninth Circuit's resolution of the en banc petition in Yukutake v. Lopez, No. 21-16756 . Signed by District Judge Andrew G. Schopler on 4/4/2025.
April 3rd, 2025
Joint MOTION to Vacate Deadlines and Direct Parties to File Joint Status Report by Rob Bonta, Allison Mendoza. ***QC MAILER sent re proposed order attached*** .
March 15th, 2025
ORDER : In light of Yukutake v. Lopez, No. 21-16756 , the parties' summary-judgment motions are denied without prejudice. By April 25, 2025, the parties may refile their motions to incorporate the Ninth Circuit's recent decision. Any responses are due Friday, May 9, 2025, and any replies are due Friday, May 16, 2025. Signed by District Judge Andrew G. Schopler on 3/15/2025.



